Dr. Dieter Zetsche is  confident that the Daimler Group's R&D spend—€5.6 billion last  year—is sufficient to counter rivals' technology advances.
Dr. Dieter Zetsche, Chairman of the Board of Management of Daimler AG and Head of Mercedes-Benz Cars, is blunt and brief on the subject of how his company will tackle  the ever more challenging difficulties of emissions reduction: “With a  lot of technology—and a lot of technology which is costly!”
Important though it is, the vexing  subject of emissions is just one of the diverse areas of technology that  any OEM and supplier must embrace and master. And most of that, too, is  very, very costly.
In the world of industrial automotive  might, Mercedes may be a major player but increasingly it faces the  threat or actuality of rivals expanding to massive proportions—with  equally massive R&D capabilities. The overarching European example  is the Volkswagen Group, now with Porsche’s capability to add to its plethora of brands with the ability to cross-link on everything from powertrains to pedals.
Can Mercedes keep up with the R&D power of VW, Toyota, and General Motors?  Zetsche is coolly confident that it can—and will: “As a Group  (Daimler), we had €106 billion in revenues in 2011 and as a proportion  we run R&D at 5%-plus of that (€5.6 billion), with Mercedes’ Cars  accounting for €3.73 billion," he told AEI. "I do not know of any car company, whatever their sales volume, that would compare favorably with such high figures!
“It doesn’t matter if a company sells  three times as many small cars as another; it matters what kind of  revenues you generate. We are second to none as far as our technological  resources and capabilities are concerned.”
But with the arrival of the latest  compact A-Class and B-Class ranges, Mercedes itself is arguably in that  small-car sector. “We have to make sure that the smaller cars are more  profitable than they used to be,” he stressed.
Zetsche stated that the new A-Class  would achieve significantly higher volume than the previous model, a  broad product mix, and would be built in three centers—Germany, Hungary,  and Finland—to achieve lower labor costs on average. He is convinced  that Mercedes will have top profitability in the segment.
The overall volume of cars with a  Mercedes badge in the compact sector? “We have a cash commitment to more  than 400,000 units, and we are investigating production in China,” he  said.
While some companies are considering  more shuttering of factories, the bullish Zetsche (an electrical  engineer whose career is founded on R&D and who has been running  Daimler since January 2006), said: “We are looking for ways and means to  expand the production capability we have at Rastatt and Kecskemét.” The  A-Class will also be assembled by Valmet in Finland.
However good prospects may look,  pan-industry technology and commercial cooperation are an increasingly  rational course. Mercedes has a close relationship with the Renault-Nissan Alliance, and Nissan’s Decherd, TN, plant will build Mercedes four-cylinder engines for Infiniti and Mercedes from 2014. Installed capacity is 250,000 units per annum,  and the facility includes crankshaft forging and cylinder block casting  operations. It will be a major source of supply and logistics for  Mercedes’ Tuscaloosa, AL, plant. Zetsche confirmed that Mercedes is  discussing what he refers to as “quite a number of other very promising”  potential cooperations but says that it is essential not to get “too  collaborated.”
Maintaining focus on product progress  and identity sees Zetsche spending at least an hour every week in his  company’s design studios: “I see every car from the first drawing to the  final styling freeze—and I get involved.”
He is also pushing his R&D  specialists (there are 15,600 in Mercedes alone; 23,200 in the Daimler  Group) to follow his own and the Board’s vision of emissions- and  accident-free driving, both of which represent high-level technology  directions. Other technology priorities are the emerging markets’ needs,  being green, and being "digitalized." The latter concerns a whole gamut  of areas including mobility concepts, connectivity between customer and  car, and car to car.
Autonomous driving he regards as not  being a big deal technologically, but legal aspects are a concern: “You  prevent 99 accidents happening, but one occurs when a vehicle is being  driven autonomously and you may get into deep trouble with just that  one. Our general philosophy is that we want to keep the driver in  control; to build a safety net around the driver so that he or she does  not pay for any wrong decisions. But that doesn’t say that, in stop-go  traffic, a driver can’t read a book.”
What worries Zetsche, though, is the  threat of hackers intervening with the operation of autonomous cars:  “These are nasty scenarios. And you can also think about governments  regulating whatever they want—speeds limits and even levels of  acceleration. We don’t like this prospect. So we are not striving for an  entirely autonomous car.”
An on-going technology issue is the fuel  cell. Zetsche is a believer in it, and the new B-Class with a  half-sandwich floor and energy storage area was designed to take the  system or other electric solutions. “Technically, I think we’re there.  We can now offer a car to a customer that is reliable and that has  similar characteristics to a combustion engine vehicle—and that can be  enjoyed. Cost wise, though, we are not there. But I believe in 3-5  years, fuel-cell cars will be in showrooms to be bought.”
Meanwhile, improvements in  combustion-engine design are very much in the frame, including some  technology that has been seen in the concept DiesOtto engine—notably  variable compression ratios. The engine demonstrates the convergence of  diesel and gasoline technologies.
The various curves of diesel and  gasoline performance are closing or crossing. Emissions legislation is  now making diesel engines very expensive items, said Zetsche. The  minimum number of cylinders is likely to be four.
As boss of one of the most  technology-led auto companies in the world, Zetsche’s response to the  question of the importance of an engineer running it is again blunt and  brief: “It’s not a must—but neither can it hurt!”
 
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar